RASIONALITAS BIROKRATIS DAN ETIKA EKOLOGIS DALAM MANAJEMEN PENDIDIKAN ISLAM: STUDI DI MAN KOTAWARINGIN TIMUR
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55799/annadzir.v4i01.949Keywords:
Bureaucratic rationality, Ecological ethics, Islamic education managementAbstract
This article aims to analyze the dominance of bureaucratic rationality and examine the integration of ecological ethics in Islamic education management through a qualitative study at MAN Kotawaringin Timur. The approach employed is qualitative, utilizing a field study design that incorporates in-depth interviews, observations, and documentation of the school principal, teachers, educational staff, and students. Data analysis was conducted interactively through data reduction, presentation, and drawing of conclusions. The results of the study indicate that educational management practices remain dominated by bureaucratic rationality, which is oriented toward administrative compliance, performance indicators, and formal procedures. Decision-making patterns tend to be top-down and limit collegial participation. On the other hand, ecological ethical values from an Islamic perspective, such as the concepts of khalifah, amanah, and mizan, have begun to be internalized in madrasah cultural practices, yet they have not been systematically integrated into institutional policies and management. This article identifies a gap between bureaucratic rationality and ecological ethical values in Islamic education management. Therefore, this article proposes an ecological amanah-based model of Islamic education management that integrates administrative efficiency with ethical responsibility and environmental sustainability. This model is expected to serve as an alternative in developing a more reflective, participatory, and sustainability-oriented governance framework for Islamic education.
References
Abdusshomad, A. (2026). Ecotheology and SDGs in Islamic Education. IQRO Journal, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.24256/iqro.v9i1.9637
Ahmed, H. (2025). Islamic Normative Legal Theory: Framework and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/jlr.2025.10056.
Almirzanah, S. (2020). God, Humanity and Nature: Cosmology in Islamic Spirituality. HTS Teologiese Studies, 76(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v76i1.6130.
Amalia, D. P., & Manshur, A. (2024). "Islamic Education Management in the Perspective of the Quran and Hadith. Firdaus Journal, 4(1), 1–6.
Andi Muda, Y. (2023). Ecotheology Perspective. Jurnal Teologi, 9(1). ttps://doi.org/10.24071/jt.v9i01.2040.
Atta, N., & Sharifi., A. (2024). Sustainability and Governance in Modern Societies. Cham: Springer.
Basith, Y., Bahri, S., & Setiawan, D. (2024). Contextualizing Nasr’s Sufism in Education in the Modern Era. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam Indonesia, 9(1), 51–60. ttps://doi.org/10.35316/jpii.v9i1.619
Beekun, R. I. (2016). Islamic Business Ethics. Herndon: International Institute of Islamic Thought.
Bush, T. (2020). Theories of Educational Leadership and Management. 5th ed. London: Sage.
Chapra, M. U. (2016). The Future of Economics: An Islamic Perspective. Leicester: Islamic Foundation.
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research Methods in Education. Edisi ke-8. London: Routledge.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. 5th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Hariyanti, R., Mustika, Agus, A., Namiri, Z., & Pahrudin, A. (2024). Islamic Education Management Paradigm and Dynamics of Contemporary Education in the Era of Kurikulum Merdeka. Jurnal 12, 10(2).
Hoy, W. K., & Miskel., C. G. (2019). Educational Administration: Theory, Research, and Practice. 10th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Khalid, F. (2019). Signs on the Earth: Islam, Modernity and the Climate Crisis. Markfield: Kube Publishing.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba., E. G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Merriam, S., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation. Edisi ke-4. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis A Methods Sourcebook (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
Nasr, S. H. (2015). Islam and the Environmental Crisis. Chicago: ABC International Group.
Nowell, L. S., M., J., Norris, D. E., & White, N. J. M. (2017). Thematic Analysis: Striving to Meet the Trustworthiness Criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847.
Purnomo, J., Anantanyu, S., Saptaningtyas, H., Majeri, F., & Mangunjaya. (2024). Prophetic Approach in Environmental Education and Community Empowerment: A Case Study of Sustainable Pesantren Development. Revista de Gestão Social e Ambiental, 18(8), 1–26.
Ritzer, G. (2020). Modern Sociological Theory. 10th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Robbins, S. P., & Coulter, M. (2021). Management. 15th ed. Boston: Pearson.
Sayem, M. A. (2021). Eco-Religious Thought of Nasr. Journal of Islam in Asia, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.31436/jia.v18i1.858.
Senge, P. M. (2017). The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization. New York: Doubleday.
Taufikin. (2025). Integrating Eco-Theology in Islamic Education. El-Tarbawi, 18(1), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.20885/tarbawi.vol18.iss1.art1.
Weber, M. (1978). Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Widiastuty, H., Hilmy, M., & Erawati, D. (2025). “Reconstructing Rationalization in Islamic Education: A Weberian Perspective. Edukasi Islami, 14(2), 379–400. https://doi.org/10.30868/ei.v14i02.8278
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods. Edisi ke-6. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
